The goal of full Employment
Employment and unemployment
Definition of Full Employment
The ideal of every government in the world is to have a situation where every person that wanted a job could get one. However, with the possible exception of the BOOM years 1960’s and 1970’s, this ideal is rarely achieved. Full employment occurs when the level of unemployment is at its lowest possible level in terms of it being consistent with an economy that is growing at its maximum ‘sustainable’ rate. Full employment does not require that unemployment is zero because every economy will have some workers unemployed for various reasons (see below) at any time – even during Boom periods.
The definition of ‘full employment’ has changed over time. During the 1960’s and 1970’s full employment occurred when unemployment was 1-2%. As unemployment increased in the 1980’s the statistical definition of full employment also changed. Full employment has generally been regarded as that level of unemployment that exists when the government’s economic growth objective is achieved. It is generally accepted that the full employment objective involves the attainment of an unemployment rate of approximately 4.5% to 5.0%. This is sometimes referred to as the natural rate of unemployment or the Non Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment (NAIRU).
Recent Commonwealth Treasury estimates have put the NAIRU at somewhere between this 4.5% – 5.0% range. A NAIRU of 4.5% would mean that any attempts to target unemployment rates below 4.5% are likely to stimulate inflation to unacceptable levels.
Why does unemployment exist when the economy is growing strongly?
- structural unemployment – where the skills of the unemployed do not match the skills required by industry. This essentially means that the structure of industry has changed or that a proportion of the working age population has not ensured they have the adequate education or training to secure jobs. For example, microeconomic reforms forced firms to become more competitive, resulting in restructuring and redundancies (TCF and MV industries are prime examples, including Ford and Holden post 2013);
- seasonal unemployment -occurs for some workers, but only at certain times of the year e.g. fruit pickers, ski instructors, etc;
- frictional unemployment – where workers move from one job to another; and
- hard core unemployment – those unable to find a job due to mental/physical characteristics that cause repeated job rejections.
With the exception of structural unemployment, the government is restricted in its ability to reduce these types of unemployment. Accordingly, the main type of unemployment the government seeks to lower via policy instruments is cyclical unemployment. This occurs when the economy is not operating at its full capacity due to aggregate demand deficiencies (e.g. when an economy experiences an economic downturn, such as a recession).
The government seeks to reduce structural unemployment by instigating measures that improve the skills of those ‘structurally unemployed’. These measures might include expenditure on education, work for dole scheme and/or subsidies to employ those who are long term unemployed (more than one year).
Quick Navigation
- Introductory concepts
- Market mechanism
- Elasticities
- Market structures
- Market Failures
- Macro economic activity/eco growth
- Inflation
- Employment & unemployment
- External Stability
- Income distribution
- Factors affecting economy
- Fiscal/Budgetary policy
- Monetary Policy
- Aggregate Supply Policies
- The Policy Mix
- Tutorials/Programs